Lab10YR — Soil Intelligence

Fragile Soils and the Infrastructure Debt Nobody Is Counting

Fragile soil is a problem. The national soil survey, compiled by the USDA-NRCS, reveals a complex landscape of soil conditions across 2.3 million map units. Most road budgets fail to account for the impact of fragile soils on infrastructure

Soil corrosivity distribution — 100 map units
High Corrosivity
Moderate
Low
Non-corrosive
22%
of U.S. map units rated High or Very High
corrosivity — major threat to steel infrastructure

Fragile soil is a problem. The national soil survey, compiled by the USDA-NRCS, reveals a complex landscape of soil conditions across 2.3 million map units. Most road budgets fail to account for the impact of fragile soils on infrastructure cost, a significant oversight for civil engineers, county planners, and transportation agencies.

Soil conditions vary widely. 13.3 percent of rated SSURGO map units carry a Fragile or higher FSI rating, which translates to 28,122 of 211,283 rated map units. This indicates a substantial portion of the country's soil is prone to fragility.

“13.3 percent — of rated SSURGO map units carry a Fragile or higher FSI rating.”
Lab10YR Analysis — SSURGO National Dataset

Where the Risk Lives

A major concern. The Fragile Soil Index, or FSI, measures soil stability, with values above 0.5 indicating elevated fragility risk. The national average FSI value is 0.272 on a 0-to-1 scale. Some states have much higher average FSI values: Nevada's average FSI is 0.521, and Arizona's is 0.495.

Regional differences are striking. Eighty percent of Nevada's map units are rated Fragile or higher, while 77 percent of Arizona's map units carry the same rating. This information is vital for infrastructure planning, as fragile soils can significantly impact construction costs and geotechnical stability.

13.3 percent
of rated SSURGO map units carry a Fragile or higher FSI rating.
0.7 percent
of SSURGO map units are rated Not fragile.

Soil Hazard Ratings — Key U.S. Infrastructure States

% of map units at each hazard class — SSURGO 315,543 map units
Source: SSURGO 315,543 map units

Support independent soil data research

Lab10YR is self-funded. Every Ko-fi contribution keeps the data pipeline running, the maps updated, and the analysis free to read.

☕ Support on Ko-fi

The Cost Nobody Budgets For

Top states — % of map units rated High or Very High soil corrosivity

Soil fragility has serious consequences. Fragile soils are more susceptible to erosion, landslides, and other geotechnical hazards, leading to significant increases in construction costs, as well as maintenance and repair costs over the lifespan of the infrastructure.

Understanding soil conditions is key. Civil engineers and county planners must consider the Fragile Soil Index and other soil-related factors to make informed decisions about infrastructure development. By doing so, they can better plan and design infrastructure projects that are resilient and cost-effective.

Soil Corrosivity Risk — Infrastructure Exposure by State

Share of map units rated High or Very High corrosivity · Source: SSURGO
Louisiana 78%, Mississippi 71%, Florida 68%, Georgia 62%, Texas 58%, S. Carolina 54%, Alabama 49%, N. Carolina 44%
Interactive map — hover for state-level data · click to open the full risk map

A Ledger the Industry Must Open

The implications are clear. Acknowledging the impact of soil fragility on construction costs and geotechnical stability, civil engineers, county planners, and transportation agencies can make more informed decisions about infrastructure development.com, or support this work at ko-fi.com/lab10yr.

🗺 Explore the Soil Risk Map →
County-level corrosivity and fragile soil index risk across the continental U.S. — with live SSURGO data lookup.
☕ Support on Ko-fi 🗺 Explore the Data ✉ Get in Touch