Lab10YR — Soil Intelligence

Why Wind Farm Micrositing Needs Soil Science

A single turbine foundation failure is expensive. It costs more than a full soil survey of the wind farm site. The survey almost never happens. Turbine foundation failure can be caused by various factors, including poor soil bearing capacit

Soil drainage suitability — wind & solar development
Exc. Drained
Well Drained
Mod. Well
Poorly Drained
52%
of map units in top wind states rated Well
Drained or better — suitable for turbine foundations

A single turbine foundation failure is expensive. It costs more than a full soil survey of the wind farm site. The survey almost never happens. Turbine foundation failure can be caused by various factors, including poor soil bearing capacity and settlement risk. Soil bearing capacity refers to the ability of the soil to support the weight of the turbine foundation. Settlement risk refers to the potential for the soil to compact or settle over time, causing the foundation to shift or become unstable.

Soil science plays a key role in understanding the physical processes that produce turbine foundation failure patterns. The Fragile Soil Index (FSI) measures soil susceptibility to erosion and degradation. A high FSI value indicates a higher risk of soil fragility, increasing the likelihood of turbine foundation failure. The FSI is calculated based on factors like soil texture, organic matter content, and soil moisture. Soil texture, for example, affects the soil's bearing capacity and settlement risk.

“STAT: 13.3% of rated SSURGO map units carry a Fragile or higher FSI rating. This indicates a significant risk of soil fragility, which can increase the likelihood of turbine foundation failure.”
Lab10YR Analysis — SSURGO National Dataset

What the Data Shows

The physical process of soil fragility is driven by a combination of factors. These include soil properties, climate, and land use. High temperatures and low precipitation can exacerbate soil fragility. The SSURGO national dataset shows that 13.3% of rated map units carry a Fragile or higher FSI rating. This indicates a significant risk of soil fragility. The national average FSI value is 0.272 on a 0-to-1 scale, with values above 0.5 indicating elevated fragility risk.

Soil fragility is a problem. It is most severe in certain states and regions. The SSURGO national dataset shows that states like Nevada, Arizona, and Utah have the highest average FSI values. In Nevada, the average FSI value is 0.521, indicating a high risk of soil fragility. This is likely due to the state's arid climate and limited vegetation. The soil profile in these regions often has low organic matter content and high sand content, increasing the risk of soil fragility.

STAT: 13.3% of rated SSURGO map units carry a Fragile or higher FSI rating. This indicates a significant risk of soil fragility, which can increase the likelihood of turbine foundation failure
STAT: 71.6% of rated map units show Moderately high or High organic matter depletion risk. This suggests that many areas of the country are at risk of soil degradation, which can affect soil bearing capacity and settlement risk

Soil Drainage Suitability — Top Renewable Energy States

% of map units by drainage class — SSURGO national dataset
Source: SSURGO national dataset

Support independent soil data research

Lab10YR is self-funded. Every Ko-fi contribution keeps the data pipeline running, the maps updated, and the analysis free to read.

☕ Support on Ko-fi

Where Exposure Is Highest

Top wind states — % of map units with suitable drainage for turbine foundations

Turbine foundation failure can be costly. It can also affect the overall efficiency and productivity of the wind farm. Understanding soil conditions and potential risks can help developers and engineers make informed decisions. They can conduct thorough soil surveys and use specialized foundation designs to mitigate failure risks. The cost of a soil survey is relatively low compared to the potential cost of turbine foundation failure.

Conducting a soil survey can impact wind farm development. Developers and engineers can avoid costly mistakes by understanding soil conditions and potential risks. They can select turbine locations that are less prone to soil fragility or use foundation designs tailored to local soil conditions. Soil science and data-driven decision making can help minimize turbine foundation failure risks. Interactive map: Soil fragility and organic matter depletion risk at lab10yr.com/Regenerative-Agriculture-Risk-Map.

Soil Foundation Suitability — Wind & Solar Energy States

% of map units rated Well Drained or better · Source: SSURGO national dataset
Texas 74%, Wyoming 71%, Kansas 68%, Oklahoma 62%, Iowa 58%, Nebraska 55%, Colorado 51%, Minnesota 48%
Interactive map — hover for state-level data · click to open the full risk map

The Engineering Blind Spot

Soil science is essential. It helps developers and engineers understand the physical processes that produce soil fragility and potential risks. They can make informed decisions about wind farm placement and design. Data-driven decision making and specialized foundation designs can minimize turbine foundation failure risks. The cost of a soil survey is relatively low compared to the potential cost of turbine foundation failure.com, or support this work at ko-fi.com/lab10yr.

🗺 Explore the Soil Risk Map →
County-level soil drainage, bearing capacity, and settlement risk across the U.S. — with live SSURGO data lookup for any site.
☕ Support on Ko-fi 🗺 Explore the Data ✉ Get in Touch